Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰñ °úµÎºÎÀÇ ¿îµ¿ ¹æÇâ¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ »ïÂ÷¿øÀû ÀÀ·ÂÇؼ®

THE THREE DIMENSIONAL STRESS ANANYSIS ON VARIOS DIRECTIONS OF THE MANDIBULAR CONDYLE MOVEMENT BY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 24±Ç 3È£ p.263 ~ 275
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¼ºÃ¶/Sung-Chul Kim ¾ö±âÁ¤/½Å¼º¼ö/ÃÖµ¿ÁÖ/±Ç¼ø¿ë/¹Ú¿µÁÖ/¹ÚÁØ¿ì/ÀÌ°ÇÁÖ/Ki-Jung Eom/Sung-Soo Shin/Dong-Joo Choi/Soon-Yong Kwon/Young-Ju Park/Jun-Woo Park/Gun-Joo Rhee

Abstract

¥´. °á ·Ð
1. Àüü¿îµ¿½Ã ÃÖ´ë ÀûÀÀ·ÂÀº -X ¹æÇâ¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª¸ç À̶§ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ÈÄ»ó¹æ ºñ°üÀý¸é Á߽ɺÎ
¿¡¼­ 40.98§¸/§² À̸ç, +X, +Y, +Z, -Y, -ZÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2. ȸÀü¿îµ¿½Ã ÃÖ´ë ÀûÀÀ·ÂÀº +Y¹æÇâ¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª¸ç ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ °úµÎ°æ Àü¹æºÎ¿¡¼­ 173.1§¸/§²ÀÌ
¸ç, Z, Z, L2 Y, Ll, Ll, X, L2, XÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
3. ÃÑ°ýÀûÀ¸·Ð Àüü¿îµ¿½Ãº¸´Ù´Â ȸÀü¿îµ¿¿¡¼­ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. ÀÀ·ÂÁýÁß ºÎÀ§´Â Àüü¿îµ¿¿¡¼­´Â °üÀý°úµÎ,ȸÀü¿îµ¿¿¡¼­´Â °üÀý°æÀ̾ú´Ù.
5. »ó±â °á°ú·Î º¼ ¶§ ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼ú½Ã °úµÎ°¡ ÈĹæºÎ·Î À§Ä¡µÇ´Â °æ¿ì¿Í Àü¹æȸÀüµÇ¾î À§Ä¡
ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ °¡Àå ÀÀ·ÂÀ» ¸¹ÀÌ ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
6. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº °á°ú·Î º¼¶§ ¼ö¼ú½Ã °úµÎ°¡ ÈĹæºÎ¿Í Àü¹æȸÀü µÇ´Â ºÎÀ§·Î À§Ä¡µÇÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï
¿¹¹æÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Ç×»ó °í·ÁµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The condlye head of mandible was usally infleunced by the stressful forces generated
from a voluntary movement of bone fragment after the sagittal ramus osteotomy which
would be mainly performed for the mandibular deformity patient.
In this While study we measured the stress value exerted on condyle and evaluated
which area of condyle had a more stress concentration while condlye head moved in X,
Y and Z axis by using a 3 dimensional finite element model
In X, Y and Z axles by using a 3 dimensional finite element model.
The resule were as follows
1. On bodily movement, the value of maximum force was 40.9§¸/cm2 at
the ( X) direction and the stress area was the center of superioposterior nonarticular
area of the condle.
2. On rotational movement, the value of maximum force was 173.1§¸/cm2
direction and the stress area was the anterior area of condyle neck.
3. From the general point of view, there were more stress on rotational movement
than on bodily movement.
4. The stress concentration area was the condyle head on bodily mevement and the
condyle neck on rotation movement.
5. From the result of this study, We found out that this results were a
correspondance with clinical predictions in which a condlye head got themost stress
concentration only when a condyle head in the posterior position and posterior rotational
position during orthognathic surgery.
6. The results of this study show that we should consider not to place the conyle
head in the positerior position and posterior rotational position during orthognathic
surgery.

Å°¿öµå

3-dimensional finito olement model; condyle head; bodily movement; rotational movement;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed